The most interesting claim made by
Tannembaum in Slave and Citizen that I found to be interesting was that slavery
was very different in Anglo America, where slaves had no rights, than in Latin
America, where black persons could buy their freedom. This surprised me because
I was always taught the Anglo American side of slavery, the civil war which
lead to the freedom of slaves. In Brazil it wouldn’t be out of the ordinary for
a black woman to be walking around in jewelry and fancy clothes.
I did not know that there was two
different super powers England and Spain could value the lives of slaves so
differently. Each of these countries had reasons for their stance of how a
slave should be treated. The Spanish went back to the devote faith in the
Catholic religion. They claimed that their God created everyone equal no matter
if that person is white or black. They thought of slavery as a unfortunate
event that a slave could eventually get through and be free. Whereas England took the science route
in why they justified slavery. They claimed that slaves were not human; instead
they were viewed as animal-like. The English scientists said that the white man
is the perfect person and all else is lower.
These two different forms of
slavery that were settled so close to one another can be so different really
surprised me. The two masters were
poles apart in the way they interacted with their slaves.